Blue Lotus: Fushigi Yuugi
Webmaster: Hakomae Setsuma

Well. That was an experience. I am certainly impressed. These just keep getting worse and worse everytime I look at them. So, maybe I'm being harsh. But I'm a Divine Dragon, I can be harsh if I want to. So, I'll stop editorializing and get to the point.

• Good Points
  • Some original thought
  • Most basic character information given
  • Quick loading, except for the image galleries
  • Nice pictures
  • CD information
  • lyric translations
  • credited translations

• Bad Points
  • not credited information taken from Tasuki No Miko
  • Editorialized - this is normally not bad, but when the comments are something like this - Miaka's page: "Maybe that's why my friend nicknamed me Miaka ..." - that kind of commentary is unnessecary, and if gives Fushigi Yuugi websites a bad name ("WAI! Tamahome-san is so kawaii!")
  • The accepted spelling of Chichiri's real name is "Houjun", not "Houjin"
  • broken picture links on the Chichiri and Mitsukake pages
  • For My Sake - N-A-K-A-G-O! NOT "NAGAKO"!
  • Tomo's description overall annoyed me
  • Some broken links to lyric translations
  • 2 broken "Single Shot" pictures, 1 broken "Group Shot" picturing
  • Various spelling and grammer errors ("seduced" not "suduced")
  • Fake "thumbnails" on the image gallery, which slows down the loading of the page (When I say "fake," I mean "that each picture is the real picture just rezised - so basically you are loading 20 50K pictures" - to quote Byakko's comprehensible explanation)

Basically, since I am in a bad mood, I'm not going to give my opinion on this page. Overall, it annoys me. However, that could just be because that damn Suzaku no Miko spoiled my plans again ...

• Style: 3, pretty much run of the mill
• Originality : 2, rather boring. Seen it before, done it before. Nothing new here folks!
• Content : Basic content on the character descriptions, no plot analysis or description, no character descriptions for anything other than Suzaku and Seiryuu characters - 2
• HTML Coding : 4 - pretty decent, I only found a few broken links, and in general pretty clean looking
• Load Time - 4 - quick! (Except for the image gallery)
• Courtesy : 4 - gave credit where it was due for the most part
• Overall : Taking the average from these catagories : 3

  Pretty bland eating, folks!